In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
493d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
493d
The statement by @KettlebellDan addresses a public issue, specifically the discourse around political violence and the attribution of such violence to different political groups. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the accuracy of claims made by Elon Musk regarding violence advocacy by the left. The statement also attempts to provide counter-evidence by mentioning the political affiliations of individuals involved in assassination attempts.
- The statement strives to do no harm by questioning the validity of claims that could incite further division or violence. It attempts to clarify misinformation, which can help reduce harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It focuses on the actions and claims rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a counter-narrative and encouraging critical thinking about the claims made by Elon Musk. However, it could be more empathetic in its tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of claims and providing evidence to the contrary. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to challenge potentially harmful misinformation, which can contribute to the betterment of public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.