Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
9/18/2024, 2:12:14 AM
X
In reply to:
Colin Fraser
@colin_fraser
·
494d
Here's a similar experiment I just tried. The fact that this works even a little bit completely blows my mind and confuses me greatly. If you asked me if this would work at all I would say definitely not.
Yuntian Deng
@yuntiandeng
·
494d
Is OpenAI's o1 a good calculator? We tested it on up to 20x20 multiplication—o1 solves up to 9x9 multiplication with decent accuracy, while gpt-4o struggles beyond 4x4. For context, this task is solvable by a small LM using implicit CoT with stepwise internalization. 1/4

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the performance of AI models in mathematical tasks, referencing previous studies and data. It aims to provide context and additional information to the ongoing conversation, contributing to the understanding of the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on sharing information and insights, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing previous studies and relevant data, which helps in building a comprehensive view of the topic. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional context and information without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]