The statement expresses frustration and disapproval regarding LinkedIn's decision to auto-opt users into using their data for AI training without explicit consent. It addresses a public issue related to data privacy and user consent, which is a significant concern in the digital age.
- The statement does not cause harm directly but expresses a negative sentiment towards LinkedIn's practice, which could be seen as a call for better practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing criticism on LinkedIn's policy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a common concern about data privacy and consent. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of LinkedIn's policy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for better data privacy practices, which can be seen as a positive influence on society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.