Andrew Curran
@AndrewCurran_
·
425d
The statement critiques the vagueness of a prediction about achieving superintelligence, suggesting that the timeline provided ('a few thousand days') is unclear and could imply a much longer period than initially perceived. The statement implies a retrenchment or a step back from more definitive claims about the timeline for achieving superintelligence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of the clarity of a prediction.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the content of the prediction rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the ambiguity in the prediction, which could lead to more precise communication in the future. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism, pointing out the vagueness without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.