The statement is sarcastic and critical, implying distrust in OpenAI's ability to handle sensitive information, especially in light of their official account being hacked. It engages with a public issue related to cybersecurity and data privacy, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm to highlight a perceived failure, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the competence of an organization.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a form of personal attack on the organization's competence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a sarcastic manner, which may not be the most responsible or constructive use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.