Rashida Tlaib

The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they address a significant international humanitarian issue and call for legislative action. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to highlight alleged human rights violations and advocate for policy change.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight a humanitarian crisis and advocate for relief, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone towards the Israeli government could be seen as potentially harmful if not substantiated with evidence.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but makes a serious accusation against a government, which could be seen as a form of political attack. The images show a peaceful protest, which aligns with respectful discourse.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes empathy and compassion for the people of Gaza by highlighting their suffering and calling for humanitarian aid.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by calling for legislative action rather than personal attacks. However, the strong language used could be seen as inflammatory.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for humanitarian aid and legislative action.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant humanitarian issue, though the strong accusatory language could be seen as contentious.