Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they address a significant public issue involving U.S. foreign policy, humanitarian aid, and potential legal and ethical violations by government officials. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that high-level officials in the Biden-Harris administration, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken, misled Congress to avoid legal repercussions and continue military support to Israel despite alleged humanitarian violations.
- The statement aims to expose what the author perceives as a serious wrongdoing, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent harm by bringing attention to the issue. However, the accusatory tone and the use of terms like 'complicit in war crimes' could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but makes serious allegations against public officials, which could be seen as a form of public accountability rather than harassment. However, the strong language used could be interpreted as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on assigning blame and highlighting alleged misconduct. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes strong accusations without offering a platform for response or discussion from the accused parties. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, which could be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the accusatory and inflammatory language may undermine this goal. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by addressing a public issue and holding officials accountable. However, the strong language and serious allegations could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.