Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 13
9/25/2024, 10:57:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
420d
@GaryMarcus @AlexTensor Gary, those folks have been there for long time. Startups are chaos engines and churn is normal. They are still shipping innovative things and executing fast. The rest is all side show.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
420d
Wait what? Murati is leaving, Schulman left, Karpathy left, Ilya left, Leike left, Brockman is on leave, perhaps a dozen others left, GPT-5 hasn’t dropped, Sora hasn’t shipped, the company had an operating loss of $5b last year, there is no obvious moat, Meta is giving away…
Mira Murati
@miramurati
·
420d
I shared the following note with the OpenAI team today.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the reasons behind the departure of key individuals from OpenAI, a topic of public interest in the tech community. The tone is speculative and somewhat critical, suggesting alternative reasons for the departures that imply doubts about leadership and capability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone but implies criticism of leadership and capability, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal details but questions the professional integrity of individuals, which could be seen as a violation of dignity. Minor violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it speculates on negative reasons for the departures without evidence. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, focusing instead on potential failures. Minor violation. [-1]