Gary Marcus

The statement by @dileeplearning and the subsequent reply by @AlexTensor engage in a discussion about the turnover at a prominent AI company, which is a matter of public interest given the company's influence in the tech industry. The conversation touches on the implications of high-profile departures and the stability of the company, which are relevant to public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement by @AlexTensor does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a critical point about the turnover, which could be seen as a constructive critique. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it does not engage in personal attacks or reveal private information beyond what is publicly known. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By highlighting the pattern of departures, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a deeper look into the company's internal dynamics, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by such changes. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a potential issue (the turnover) without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]