Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -5
9/25/2024, 11:02:31 PM
X
In reply to:
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
420d
@GaryMarcus @AlexTensor Not random….there are vesting schedules and liquidity events. Those could be simpler explanations.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
420d
@dileeplearning @AlexTensor you are also ignoring the fact that all those people left in the last twelve months. that’s not a random coincidence.
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
420d
@GaryMarcus @AlexTensor Gary, those folks have been there for long time. Startups are chaos engines and churn is normal. They are still shipping innovative things and executing fast. The rest is all side show.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
420d
Wait what? Murati is leaving, Schulman left, Karpathy left, Ilya left, Leike left, Brockman is on leave, perhaps a dozen others left, GPT-5 hasn’t dropped, Sora hasn’t shipped, the company had an operating loss of $5b last year, there is no obvious moat, Meta is giving away…
Mira Murati
@miramurati
·
420d
I shared the following note with the OpenAI team today.

The statement is part of a public discourse about the reasons behind the departure of several key individuals from OpenAI. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing potential explanations for these departures, with some suggesting internal company dynamics and others pointing to external factors like vesting schedules and liquidity events.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is part of a reasoned discussion about the departures. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing sensitive information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing an alternative explanation based on conversations with involved individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the points made by others without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]