Gary Marcus

The statement and the preceding conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the nature and claims of OpenAI, specifically its status as a non-profit organization. The conversation critiques the authenticity of OpenAI's non-profit status and its implications for public trust and transparency in AI research.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and conversation aim to address potential misinformation and hold an organization accountable, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on the organization rather than personal attacks, thus upholding the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By discussing the transparency and ethical considerations of a major AI organization, the conversation promotes understanding and empathy regarding the impact of AI on society, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The conversation engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's claims, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the organization's actions, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]