In reply to:
2024=2023+1 (e/acc)
@commondoubts
·
412d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and management style of a public figure in the tech industry, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but it does criticize the individual’s understanding and management style, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the individual's professional capabilities and management style. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and somewhat dismissive. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the professional capabilities and decisions of the individual. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.