In reply to:
Rashida Tlaib
@RashidaTlaib
·
30d
The statement expresses frustration and concern over the U.S. State Department's handling of a situation where U.S. citizens are unable to evacuate from Lebanon due to high costs and canceled flights. The tone is critical and aims to hold the State Department accountable for what is perceived as a failure to protect American citizens.
- The statement aims to highlight a failure in a government department, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent harm by advocating for better protection of citizens. However, the critical tone might not fully align with the principle of striving to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It focuses on the actions of the State Department rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion by highlighting the distress of citizens trying to evacuate. It calls attention to their plight and the barriers they face. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived failure of the State Department. However, it could be seen as somewhat harsh and might benefit from a more balanced approach that also suggests solutions.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for improved government action to protect citizens. It aims to hold the State Department accountable and push for better support for those in need. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.