Rashida Tlaib

Rank 6 of 47
|
Score 243

The statement is highly critical of U.S. foreign policy and the actions of the Israeli government, specifically targeting the U.S. support for Israel and accusing both governments of war crimes. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, reflecting strong opposition to the described military actions and funding. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing significant geopolitical issues and the ethical implications of military aid and actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It uses strong language such as 'bloodbath,' 'war criminal,' and 'genocidal plan,' which can be inflammatory and may incite further division and hostility. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly by labeling a specific individual as a 'war criminal' and accusing them of a 'genocidal plan.' This constitutes a personal attack. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses harsh and accusatory language that is likely to polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than focusing on policy critique. (-2 points) [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant issue, but it does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive. The inflammatory language detracts from a reasoned debate on the topic. (-1 point) [-1]