In reply to:
Marc Beckman
@MarcBeckman
·
409d
The statement '@MarcBeckman nor should they be, at the current level to technological maturity.' is a response in a conversation about the legality and technological maturity of autonomous vehicles (AVs). This discussion touches on public issues related to technology, regulation, and public safety, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual assertion about the current state of technology and its appropriateness for widespread legal adoption. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a factual discussion about technological maturity, which can indirectly promote understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a reasoned response to a previous comment. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a substantive discussion about public safety and technology. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.