Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
9/28/2024, 9:04:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Jyrї Hüttünen
@HuttunenJyri
·
408d
@GaryMarcus @aniccia I bet they are decades away and will never reach full "level 5" autonomy in the company's lifetime.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
409d
@aniccia I would say as i did that they are *testing* genuine autonomy, but that without information about how much tele-op etc is going on we can’t fully assess how close they are to having it.

I would say they are is still a long way away, even in the tested cities, and that they…
John Berry (aniccia.bsky.social)
@aniccia
·
409d
@GaryMarcus Whoa, SAE J3016 calls Waymo's type of system "cooperative" and specifically warns against calling it "autonomous." Waymo's system is closer to an exceptionally good ADAS with a so unacceptably bad ADS that it depends on human assistance to handle ordinary conditions.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
409d
It is astonishing to me that some people still have not learned the difference between genuinely autonomous vehicles (which Waymo is actively testing in some warm-weather cities in CA, AZ, and TX) and driver-assist (like Tesla FSD, which must have a human in the loop at all…

The statement engages in a discussion about the future of autonomous vehicle technology, specifically addressing the timeline for achieving full 'level 5' autonomy. The tone is speculative and somewhat optimistic, suggesting that Alphabet (Waymo) will continue to progress, albeit over a long period. The statement contributes to the public discourse on technological advancements and their timelines.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone, contributing to a constructive discussion about the future of autonomous vehicles. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a dialogue about the realistic timelines for achieving full autonomy in vehicles, which can help set public expectations. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, responding to a previous comment with a different perspective without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]