The statement critiques the foundational principles of OpenAI, suggesting that its non-profit governance and profit cap were misleading or deceptive. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to corporate governance, ethics, and transparency in the tech industry.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as harshly critical.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Β [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory.Β [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of an attack on the organization's principles.Β [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived issues in a major organization, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment.Β [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.