The statement and accompanying image address a significant change in the structure and mission of OpenAI, a prominent organization in the field of artificial intelligence. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the shift to a for-profit model contradicts previous promises and benefits the wealthy at the expense of 'normal people.' The statement calls for a boycott of generative AI (GenAI) technologies, implying a broader critique of the industry.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices and could be seen as striving to prevent harm by warning the public about potential exploitation. However, the accusatory tone and lack of constructive suggestions may not fully align with this principle.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy of individuals but is critical of specific public figures. The tone is harsh and could be seen as bordering on personal attack, which may not fully respect the dignity of those involved.
Ā [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes empathy and compassion for 'normal people' who may feel betrayed by the shift to a for-profit model. However, it lacks a balanced perspective and does not foster understanding or dialogue.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack on Sam Altman and others involved. It does not encourage constructive dialogue or offer solutions.
Ā [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant issue, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the call to boycott GenAI without a nuanced discussion may not fully uphold responsible use of influence.
Ā [+1]