Jake Tapper

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 108

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the evolution of a political figure's stance on border security policies. The tone is neutral and explanatory, aiming to justify a change in policy stance by a public official.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It neutrally explains a policy shift, which is a normal part of political discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining the rationale behind a policy change. It does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion, but it does aim to clarify a public issue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a policy change without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges that policy positions can evolve, which is a form of acknowledging and correcting past stances. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by discussing a relevant public issue with integrity. [+1]