The statement by @GovPritzker responds to a comment made by Donald Trump about Kamala Harris. It engages in a public issue by addressing a political figure's remarks about another political figure, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as perpetuating a cycle of negative rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a personal attack by suggesting Trump is projecting his own issues onto others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it resorts to a personal attack, which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform to promote responsible and constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.