In reply to:
NaClKayaker
@NaClKayaker97
·
165d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
165d
The statement 'Not true. They were halted by SCOTUS.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about a historical political event, specifically the 2000 U.S. Presidential election and the role of the Supreme Court in halting the vote count in Florida. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a point of historical fact.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual correction. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to clarify a factual point, which can contribute to informed discourse.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by correcting a perceived factual error without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to correct a factual point. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.