Marianne Williamson

The statement '@Justice_Taft Comparing yourself to Taft makes sense:)' does not constitute public discourse. It is a lighthearted, conversational reply that does not substantively engage with the public issue of climate change discussed in the preceding conversation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm with words and actions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not engage with the principles of free speech in a substantive way.