Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by @ChrisFNunes, National NOW President, criticizes Governor Gavin Newsom's veto, accusing him of siding with unregulated Big Tech and failing his constituents. The tone is critical and the intent is to hold a public figure accountable for a policy decision, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of a public figure's actions. It adheres to the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on a public figure's policy decision rather than engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and accountability regarding a public policy decision, which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public figure's policy decision without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the National NOW President to advocate for what they believe is the betterment of society by holding a public figure accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in public discourse with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.