In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
291d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
291d
The statement 'Most of their points weren’t true' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the debate around SH-1047 and the accountability of Silicon Valley companies. The tone is dismissive and challenges the validity of the points made by others in the conversation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is dismissive without providing evidence or constructive feedback. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. This is neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the points made by others without explanation. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the points without providing a counter-argument or evidence. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not misuse free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster meaningful dialogue. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.