The statement and accompanying images discuss the effectiveness of AI coding assistants, suggesting that developers gain little benefit from them. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with the broader debate on the utility of AI tools in software development.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as dismissive of the potential benefits of AI coding assistants. However, it is based on a study, which lends it credibility.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the limitations of AI coding assistants, but it may also discourage their use without considering all perspectives.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents findings from a study, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the effectiveness of AI tools, the statement uses its platform to inform and potentially improve decision-making in the tech industry. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.