Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 47

The statement critiques the overhyped expectations of generative AI in coding, referencing studies that show minimal improvements. It aims to provide a reality check on the effectiveness of AI coding assistants, which is a relevant public issue in the tech industry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on data and studies rather than personal attacks. It adheres to this principle.ย [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing evidence-based insights, which can foster a more informed discussion about AI in coding. It adheres to this principle.ย [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the gap between expectations and reality without resorting to personal attacks. It adheres to this principle.ย [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to better inform society about the realistic capabilities of AI in coding, which can help manage expectations and guide future developments. It adheres to this principle.ย [+1]