In reply to:
Luiza Jarovsky
@LuizaJarovsky
·
250d
The statement 'Scientific research ≠ commercial purposes' is a concise assertion that scientific research should not be conflated with commercial activities. This statement is a response to a discussion about a legal case involving the use of copyrighted images for AI training without consent, which touches on the broader issue of the ethical and legal boundaries between scientific research and commercial exploitation.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral assertion, so it upholds this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a distinction between scientific research and commercial purposes, which can foster empathy and compassion for creators whose work might be used without consent. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by contributing a relevant point to the discussion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight an important ethical issue, which can contribute to the betterment of society by encouraging responsible use of copyrighted material. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.