In reply to:
Andrey Fradkin
@AndreyFradkin
·
251d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the future economic impacts of AI, referencing current data and models. It critiques speculative promises and provides a reasoned argument about the costs associated with scaling AI models. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to contribute to the debate on AI's economic implications.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on a reasoned critique rather than personal attacks. It maintains a professional tone and does not engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing current data and providing a reasoned argument. It encourages a critical examination of speculative promises about AI's future impacts. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than attacking individuals. It provides a reasoned critique and contributes to the dialogue on AI's economic impacts. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.