In reply to:
Nirmal Patel
@fromnirmal
·
250d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
250d
Luiza Jarovsky
@LuizaJarovsky
·
250d
The statement engages in a discussion about the implications of a court decision on AI copyright and its potential commercial use, which is a public issue. The tone is measured and analytical, aiming to clarify a point of view rather than provoke or attack.
- The statement strives to do no harm by expressing a personal opinion without attacking others. It maintains a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the speaker's perspective on the court decision and its implications for commercial use. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment and contributing to the ongoing discussion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.