In reply to:
LostAKJ
@AKJ_N5T
·
249d
Iris van Rooij 💭
@IrisVanRooij
·
250d
The statement 'I am not sure why Iris acts like I don’t exist.' does not constitute public discourse. It is a personal remark directed at an individual, expressing a feeling of being ignored. It does not engage substantively with the public issue being discussed, which is the feasibility of achieving human-level AI.
- The statement does not cause harm directly, but it could be seen as a passive-aggressive comment that might lead to unnecessary tension. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual it addresses, as it publicly questions their behavior in a way that could be perceived as accusatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it makes a personal remark that could be seen as a mild personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.