The statement 'For shame, @TechCrunch. Please please stop.' is a response to a conversation about the anthropomorphizing of AI in a TechCrunch article. The tone is critical and somewhat admonishing, aiming to correct what the author perceives as a misleading portrayal of AI capabilities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a shaming tone, which could be seen as mildly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of a public article, not an attack on an individual. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the content of the article, not the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue (the portrayal of AI). [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.