In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
81d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
82d
Andriy Burkov
@burkov
·
82d
The statement 'Why so aggressive, mate?' is a response to a perceived aggressive tone in a previous comment. The conversation revolves around the sharing of a link to a study on the effects of generative AI on software developers. The tone of the statement is questioning and seeks to address the perceived aggression in the discourse.
- The statement aims to address perceived aggression, which can be seen as an attempt to reduce harm in the conversation. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the aggressive tone, the statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by addressing the tone of the conversation and encouraging a more respectful dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the tone rather than attacking the person, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.