Gary Marcus

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the impact of AI on software development productivity, referencing specific studies and reports. The tone of the conversation is somewhat contentious, with participants expressing frustration and disagreement over the sharing and interpretation of sources.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the aggressive tone in the preceding conversation could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement and the preceding conversation respect the privacy of individuals, focusing on the topic rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement and the preceding conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as the tone is more confrontational than collaborative. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement and the preceding conversation engage in dialogue but do so in a manner that includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly in the response by @edzitron. [-2]