Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 109

The statement critiques JD Vance for invoking a personal anecdote about a friend needing an abortion while supporting a president who has taken actions to restrict abortion rights. The tone is critical and appears to highlight a perceived inconsistency or hypocrisy in Vance's stance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but is critical in nature. It does not use inflammatory language, so it moderately adheres to this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not revealing personal details about the friend mentioned. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out a perceived inconsistency, but it does so in a critical manner rather than a compassionate one. It partially adheres to this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions and positions of JD Vance and the president. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue responsibly, though it is critical in nature. [+2]