Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 120

The statement critiques a public figure's performance in a debate, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on pointing out a perceived failure. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack by mocking the individual. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on criticizing another's actions.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly due to its sarcastic and mocking tone. [-1]