In reply to:
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
30d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
30d
The statement by @RickFernandes90 references historical movements to counter the claim that freedom and liberty have not been achieved nonviolently. It engages in a substantive discussion about historical examples of nonviolent movements, thus contributing to public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It references historical facts in a neutral manner. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing historical examples that support the argument for nonviolent movements. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing counterexamples without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.