In reply to:
Infinity108
@infinity108p
·
393d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
393d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the implications of voting for a particular candidate in the context of a broader political discussion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a negative consequence of voting for a particular candidate, which could be seen as a form of political pressure. This is a minor concern. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains focused on the political implications rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on the strategic implications of voting, which is neutral in this context.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward political opinion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.