Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the motivations behind large corporations and investment funds supporting tech companies, using WeWork as a case study. It questions the intentions of entities like NVIDIA, Microsoft, and sovereign wealth funds in sustaining potentially non-viable businesses.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but implies skepticism about corporate motives, which can be seen as a critical perspective rather than harmful.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on questioning motives without providing constructive insights. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of critique but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support its implications. [-1]