Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47

Score 110

I don’t happen to agree with every assumption in here, but even so this plan seems a hell of lot better than letting some wealth, power-hungry individual with a truthiness problem decide the fate of humanity.

Definitely worth a read; comments open to all.

Andrea Miotti

@_andreamiotti

297d

A NARROW PATH

If attempts to build superintelligent AI succeed, we face extinction as a species.

We must choose a different path, one where we control what we create. One where AI is a tool for human advancement, not a successor species.

Humanity has no plan, so we built one.

10/3/2024, 9:22:39 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential risks of superintelligent AI and the importance of having a plan to manage its development. It critiques the idea of leaving such decisions to individuals with questionable motives and encourages public engagement by inviting comments.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for a controlled approach to AI development. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by encouraging readers to consider the plan and engage in discussion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement invites constructive dialogue by opening comments to all, though it uses strong language to critique certain individuals. [+1]