Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 110
10/3/2024, 9:32:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
296d
@GaryMarcus "Just don't do it" isn't going to cut it at all...
Not going to happen.
What we need is *better* intelligence, sooner
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
I don’t happen to agree with every assumption in here, but even so this plan seems a hell of lot better than letting some wealth, power-hungry individual with a truthiness problem decide the fate of humanity.

Definitely worth a read; comments open to all.
Andrea Miotti
@_andreamiotti
·
298d
A NARROW PATH

If attempts to build superintelligent AI succeed, we face extinction as a species.

We must choose a different path, one where we control what we create. One where AI is a tool for human advancement, not a successor species.

Humanity has no plan, so we built one.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the potential risks and management of superintelligent AI. It acknowledges the complexity of the issue and engages in a broader conversation about AI governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and acknowledges the complexity of the issue, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By engaging in a conversation about AI risks, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages constructively with differing viewpoints, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]