The MIT Press @mitpress.bsky.social
@mitpress
·
350d
The statement and the linked conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with significant public issues related to AI governance, corporate ethics, and the influence of powerful tech figures like Sam Altman. The tone is critical and cautionary, aiming to raise awareness about the potential risks associated with AI and the governance of AI companies.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm from AI governance, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and awareness of AI risks, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI governance and corporate ethics, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on systemic issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight societal concerns about AI governance, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly discuss public concerns about AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.