Sebastian Seung
@SebastianSeung
·
304d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of neuroscience research on machine learning (ML) approaches, specifically questioning the relevance of learning mechanisms like backpropagation in AI. The conversation critiques current ML models by comparing them to biological systems, suggesting that some AI methods may not align with how natural systems function.
- The statement does not directly harm but challenges existing ML approaches, encouraging critical evaluation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation promotes understanding by linking neuroscience findings to AI, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The critique is constructive, focusing on scientific evidence and encouraging further exploration rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.