The statement by Gary Marcus critiques OpenAI, suggesting it may resort to surveillance for profit, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to privacy and corporate ethics.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm from OpenAI's future actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by highlighting potential privacy violations by OpenAI, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement critiques OpenAI's potential actions without personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to responsibly critique a company's potential future actions, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.