In reply to:
Dan McAteer
@DannyMcAteer8
·
313d
The statement by Gary Marcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with the ongoing debate about the limitations and future of deep learning, a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence. The statement references a detailed critique of a paper on deep learning, suggesting that fundamental challenges remain unresolved.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of a technological approach.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering a detailed analysis of the issues with deep learning. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by reviewing an article line by line, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss important issues in AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.