Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 114
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
313d
@DannyMcAteer8 @tsarnick 1. Ask Bindu Reddy? or read my substack, where I review that article line by line – none of what I raised has been solved, not even with 01: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
10/4/2024, 10:54:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Igor Kotenkov
@stalkermustang
·
313d
@DannyMcAteer8 @tsarnick Brutal.
Dan McAteer
@DannyMcAteer8
·
313d
@tsarnick What happened to deep learning hitting a wall?
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
313d
Gary Marcus says he believes OpenAI will become "the most Orwellian company of all time" because they will be forced to turn to surveillance in order to make money

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the future of deep learning and AI, referencing opinions and critiques from various individuals in the field. It engages with public discourse by addressing concerns about AI development and its societal implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a metaphor ('missing the forest for the trees') to critique others' perspectives, which is a neutral expression in this context.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing others' views without offering constructive insights. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the subject matter rather than individuals. [+1]