Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a public figure, Eli Crane, discussing conspiracy theories related to a significant public event, the alleged assassination attempts on Trump. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but promoting conspiracy theories can indirectly cause harm by spreading misinformation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved in the alleged event by promoting unverified claims, which can be seen as a form of harassment or defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it endorses divisive conspiracy theories. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it rather promotes unsubstantiated claims without evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Using influence to promote conspiracy theories does not contribute to the betterment of society. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly by spreading potentially harmful misinformation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.