Jake Tapper

The statement provides an analysis of Kamala Harris' campaign strategy by comparing it to previous campaigns of Obama and Clinton. It highlights concerns within the Democratic party about Harris' approach, suggesting a misalignment between her campaign's positioning and its execution.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It presents an analysis based on data and observations, maintaining a neutral tone.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide insight into campaign strategies, which can contribute to a better understanding of political dynamics.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by analyzing campaign strategies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By analyzing political campaign strategies, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about political dynamics, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly by providing a data-driven analysis of political campaigns. [+1]