In reply to:
Marlon J. Ettinger
@MarlonEttinger
·
291d
Jake Tapper
@jaketapper
·
291d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing historical political smears and their persistence. It critiques a book and references a refutation by the New York Sun, suggesting the endurance of misinformation.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on historical events rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a refutation, encouraging informed discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the book rather than attacking the author. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.