Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on the appearance of a convicted Jan. 6 rioter at a rally organized by a self-described Christian Nationalist, attended by public figures. It highlights the involvement of individuals with controversial backgrounds in a public event, which could contribute to civic dialogue about political and social issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as highlighting potentially harmful associations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not engaging in harassment or hate speech, but it does mention individuals by name, which could be seen as intrusive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on reporting attendance.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about the involvement of controversial figures, which could be seen as contributing to societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public event and uses its platform to inform the public responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.