Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 160
10/13/2024, 7:00:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Kimber Wren 🐊🇺🇸
@KimberWren
·
13d
@marwilliamson Should they lose their license? Not for him to decide, but this isn’t a matter of him not liking the interview: they cut and pasted her words in the video to change what she said. Thats journalistic malfeasance.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
Trump says the government should cancel CBS’s license because he doesn’t like their interview with Kamala. That’s unadulterated straight up dictator talk. The fact that those words would even be uttered by a Presidential candidate is appalling. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/…

The statement 'I agree completely' is a direct response to a conversation about journalistic integrity and free speech, which are public issues. The conversation involves a critique of a public figure's comments on media licensing, which is a substantive public discourse topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and aligns with the principle by supporting a critique of journalistic malfeasance. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with a critique of altering interview content, which is a call for journalistic integrity. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement supports the principle of free speech by agreeing with a critique of altering interview content and the importance of journalistic integrity. [+1]